A firestorm of debate has been swirling in Rwanda the last few weeks
related to abortion legislation. A study, conducted by the National
University of Rwanda’s School of Public Health and the U.S.-based
Guttmacher Institute, in collaboration with the Ministry of Health,
concluded that an estimated 60,000 induced abortions occurred in 2009.
This translates to a national rate of 25 abortions per 1,000 women of
reproductive age. These estimates of abortion incidence in Rwanda
project that one in 40 women aged 15-44 had an abortion in 2009. The
researchers gathered data from a nationally representative sample of
health facilities and knowledgeable key informants to draw these
conclusions. It appears that from the representative sample more than
40% of women who had an abortion – suffered complications that required
medical treatment.
Let me make these estimates practical. At the church I pastor there
are about 100 women between the ages of 15 to 44 each Sunday. By these
estimates at least 2 had an abortion and 1 suffered health complications
due to the abortion in the last year. I lecture at KIST. In 2010 with
my 143 female students 4 would have had an abortion and it is likely 2
of them suffered health complications. At first glance this does not
seem like a statistical “big deal” until you start multiplying by the
years of female reproduction. With a 29 year window of reproduction the
number becomes catastrophic with 29 out of 40 women having an abortion
in their lifetime and 11 of them having health complications.
I am consistently pro-life. I’m troubled by both the loss of unborn
life and the loss of health (and occasional life) by unsafe and illegal
abortions. What do people with strong pro-life convictions do with such
statistics?
First, courageously pursue truth. This research was done by gathering
a representative sample and then multiplying. Was the sample truly
representative? If they are accurate we need to do some deep soul
searching. If not, the statistics are not accurate. I’ve asked to see
the research details, but so far do not have a copy. I would like a
copy, and I think many others also would like to read the details of the
research.
Until I have a copy I will still trust my pastoral intuition. My
experience concludes there are many unplanned pregnancies in Rwanda
(after all young people have sex and sex produces children). Many young
women wrestle with idea of abortion. Some abort and face horrible
consequences. However, most do not abort.
The religious among us sometimes spend far too much time and energy
handing out blame. The practical result is in the process those of us
who are politically pro-life are practically abortion advocates. We
don’t deal well with paradox. Sometimes, we substitute rule-keeping for
beauty. For instance, in advocating for abstinence we forget to be
gracious when reality knocks.
In 2005 I was at a Groupe Biblique Universitaire (GBU) function at
KIST. The organizers intended to encourage abstinence. They used a drama
that poked fun at a pregnant university student. The students roared in
laughter. I was aghast. If there was 1 young woman in the audience
facing an unplanned pregnancy our humor had just told her to have an
abortion. We had communicated we were not gracious enough to deal with
reality.
Since then at least once per year I speak publicly at church and on
campus that if you are pregnant and unmarried you can talk to me. I
won’t hand out blame. I won’t solve all your problems. However, together
we’ll find a solution that protects life. I’ve had a few people leave
CCR when I preach that message. I’ve also had a few parents hold their
teenage children’s hand and cry. Later, they’ve told me they are
thankful a religious authority told their children that though we preach
the beauty of abstinence we live the beauty of forgiveness. We would
choose to have an unexpected grandchild over an abortion. I also mention
that if your father is a leader in a Balokole church the unspoken
pressures to abort are immense. I’ve watched young women nod their heads
and after the discussions double check with me that “you won’t blame.”
Exactly, I preach and live the pro-life virtues of truth and
forgiveness.
Honestly, I enjoy holding babies whether they have a legal father or
not. I’ll do all I can to help each one of those youthful friend’s
children. I’ve performed a multiple of weddings where the bride was
pregnant and I knew it. I’ve also hurried up my schedule with a
“desperately in love” couple who had a full-term baby 6 months after the
wedding. I had a suspicion, but chose to be discreet. I’m aghast when I
hear of pastors debating whether they should perform weddings for
pregnant brides. When most seasoned pastors double check their marriage
registry records against their birth registry they find a surprising
number of current church leaders who had children 6 months after their
marriage dates. Truth and forgiveness are pro-life virtues.
Lastly, is the pro-life virtue of compassion. Some conclude that
children conceived in chaos are best off not to be born. Some conclude
that a child with certain medical difficulties caused by a crisis
pregnancy and a premature birth are better not to be born. I
respectfully disagree. The best evidence I can offer for the virtue of
compassion is found in families and churches in Rwanda. Our churches and
families have nurtured children born in chaos with medical difficulties
back to astounding health. Who are we to conclude that they were better
off not born? To do so would take the place of God. All children
deserve a life in a family. Thus I am clearly pro-life. My community is
one that practices the pro-life virtues of truth, forgiveness, and
compassion.
This is by far one of the most compassion inducing posts I've read on this often divisive issue. Thank you for sharing it.
ReplyDelete